Page 131 - 15Diarrhoeaandvomiting
P. 131

Diarrhoea and vomiting caused by gastroenteritis in children under 5 years




                        significantly more diarrhoea than those receiving placebo. In the first 24 hour period, the mean
                        number of diarrhoeal episodes in the ondansetron group (n = 64) was 4.70 compared with 1.37
                        in the placebo group (n = 54) (P = 0.002) and in the second 24 hours was 2.98 episodes (n = 62)
                        compared with 0.96 episodes (n = 51) (P = 0.015).
                        The  third  trial  from  the  USA 160   included  children  aged  1–10  years  with  acute  gastritis  or
                        gastroenteritis and mild to moderate dehydration who failed ORT in the emergency department
                        (n  =  106).  Exclusion  criteria  were  receipt  of  anti-emetics  in  the  6  hours  prior  to  enrolment,
                        underlying  chronic  illness,  shock  state  requiring  immediate  IV  fluids,  severe  (10%  or  more)
                        dehydration, and known sensitivity to 5HT  antagonists. Participants were randomised to treatment
                                                           3
                        with oral ondansetron (dose appropriate for weight) (n = 51) or placebo (n = 55). The methods of
                        randomisation were adequate and the study was conducted double-blind. With estimated failure
                        rates of 30% in the ondansetron group and 60% in the placebo group to achieve a power of
                        80% with a significance level of 0.05, 48 participants were required in each group. Outcomes
                        were measured daily for up to 6 days or until symptoms resolved if sooner, and were cessation of
                        vomiting, IV fluid administration, hospitalisation and frequency of diarrhoea. [EL = 1+]
                        Baseline  comparability  of  the  groups  was  similar  except  that  statistically  significantly  more
                        children in the ondansetron group were ‘moderately’ dehydrated. Hence more children were
                        mildly dehydrated in the placebo group but this was not statistically significant. Nine percent
                        of participants did not participate in follow-up telephone interviews and three patients in the
                        ondansetron group were incorrectly diagnosed. The investigators reported that 93% of patients
                        who had received ondansetron had fewer than three episodes of vomiting during a 6 day follow-
                        up, compared with 88% of patients in the placebo group. Insufficient data were available to
                        establish the statistical significance of this difference or of the reported mean number of vomiting
                        episodes between the groups. Fewer of the children receiving ondansetron required IVT (9/48)
                        than those treated with placebo (30/55), the difference being statistically significant (RR 0.34;
                        95% CI 0.18 to 0.65). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the
                        numbers of children admitted to hospital. Nineth-three percent of patients who had received
                        placebo had fewer than three episodes of diarrhoea during a 6 day follow-up, compared with 80%
                        in the ondansetron group. Insufficient data were available to establish the statistical significance
                        of this difference or of the reported mean number of diarrhoeal episodes between the groups.

                        Data on cessation of vomiting was extracted from two trials 163,164  and pooled in a meta-analysis.
                        The results showed that more children in the ondansetron groups stopped vomiting in the first
                        few hours after treatment (146/181) compared with those who received placebo (116/178). This
                        difference was statistically significant (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.49) (Figure 8.1).
                        All three trials 160,163,164  compared the effects of oral ondansetron with placebo on IV hydration.
                        These findings were pooled in a meta-analysis which showed that fewer of the children receiving
                        ondansetron required IVT than those treated with placebo (79/233), with the difference being
                        statistically significant (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.59) (Figure 8.2).
                        The data from the trials 160,163,164  were pooled for the number of patients admitted to hospital after
                        the emergency department stay. The findings showed that statistically significantly fewer children
                        given ondansetron were admitted to hospital (9/232) compared with those given placebo (23/233)
                        (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.82) (Figure 8.3).
                        The fourth US study 161  recruited children aged 6 months to 12 years presenting to an emergency
                        department with paediatrician-identified acute gastritis or gastroenteritis (defined as more than
                        three vomits over previous 24 hours) with mild or moderate dehydration who had failed ORT.
                        Those with current chronic medical disease (excluding asthma), with a history of abdominal
                        surgery, requiring chronic medications, with inhaled or other corticosteroid or anti-emetic use in
                        the previous fortnight or with diagnostic findings inconsistent with isolation acute viral gastritis
                        were excluded. The trial had three arms and participants were randomised to a 10 minute infusion
                        with 0.15 mg/kg IV ondansetron (n = 46), 1 mg/kg IV dexamethasone (n = 55) or a 10 ml bolus
                        of normal saline (placebo) (n = 44). The methods of randomisation were adequate and patients
                        and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. An a priori power calculation was
                        done to estimate the sample size required in each group. The main outcomes measured were
                        need for hospitalisation, tolerance of oral hydration and dehydration status at 2 and 4 hours post
                        treatment, and patients were followed up to 72 hours. [EL = 1−]



            106
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136