Page 114 - Pagetit
P. 114

4. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY OF DEPENDENCE FOR DIFFERENT DRUG CLASSES




                     corresponded with the initial appearance of a decrease in cocaine self-
                     administration behaviour in rats (Kantak et al., 2001). The antibody response
                     was maximal after the third immunization and remained at this level for
                     4months. As with rats, there was substantial variability between individuals
                     in the magnitude of the antibody response. By one year after immunization,
                     antibody levels in all three groups declined to baseline values. Adverse effects
                     were minor and included small temperature elevations, mild pain and
                     tenderness at the site of injection, and muscle twitch at the highest dose.
                        Phase II clinical trials with TA-CD are currently underway; however, press
                     releases describing preliminary findings are available on the Internet. In the
                     initial phase II study, an improved dosing regimen was initiated to boost anti-
                     cocaine antibody levels. The immunotherapy produced high levels of
                     antibodies against cocaine which approached levels produced in the rodent
                     self-administration model.
                        In terms of clinical treatment with the cocaine immunotherapy, it is likely
                     to work best with individuals who are highly motivated to quit using drugs
                     altogether, since anti-cocaine antibodies are liable to have pharmacological
                     specificity in addition to their behavioural specificity. The cocaine
                     immunotherapy induces antibodies that are highly specific for recognizing
                     cocaine and its active metabolite norcocaine and active derivative
                     cocaethylene (Fox et al., 1996), and therefore they would not recognize
                     structurally dissimilar stimulants.
                        It is clear from the present series of studies that the anti-cocaine actions
                     of the cocaine immunotherapy emerge gradually over time once
                     immunization begins. Therefore, the immunotherapy is not expected to
                     immediately target craving for cocaine. Craving is significantly more common
                     among inpatients than outpatients, but cocaine-abstinent individuals report
                     less craving across outpatient treatment and follow-up compared to moderate
                     and heavy cocaine users (Bordnick & Schmitz, 1998). On the basis of these
                     considerations, it is hypothesized that treatment with the cocaine
                     immunotherapy may eventually help ease craving and prevent relapse if it
                     extinguishes cocaine use. Adjunct treatment with an anti-craving medication
                     may help in this regard, particularly during the immunization process. How
                     anti-cocaine antibodies interact with anti-craving medications deserves
                     serious attention (e.g. Kuhar et al., 2001) as the development of these
                     medications continues and the ability of the immunotherapy to block the
                     reinforcing effects of cocaine in human clinical trials unfolds.
                        The ethical implications of this new type of therapy are considered in
                     Chapter 7.

                     Amphetamines

                     Introduction
                     Amphetamines include  ∆-amphetamine, L-amphetamine, ephedrine,
                     methamphetamine, methylphenidate, and pemoline. Another member of this


                                                     93




          Chapter_4                93                              19.1.2004, 11:43
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119