Page 64 - The Flying Publisher Guide to Hepatitis C Treatment
P. 64

64   | Hepatitis C Treatment

                                   Alternative RBV formulation
                                    Optimal RBV dosages are essential in achieving a SVR.
                                   Maintenance of RBV in the therapeutic regimen has been proven
                                   to have an important additive effect in the overall success rate,
                                   leading to both increased RVR and reduced rates of relapses (as
                                   demonstrated by the PROVE-2 trial).
                                    As described in chapter 1, the main impediment in the
                                   administration of high-dose RBV is the dose-dependent
                                   development of hemolytic anemia. Although the addition of
                                   epoetin alfa has been useful in maintaining the highest possible
                                   RBV doses, new RBV-replacement compounds, with an improved
                                   side effects profile, are investigated.
                                    Taribavirin – formerly known as viramidine – (Valeant
                                   Pharmaceuticals International/Kadmon Pharmaceuticals LLC), is
                                   a prodrug of RBV, converted in the active form by adenosine
                                   deaminase. This nucleoside analog was studied for the treatment
                                   of CHC, due to the lower frequency of anemia, a benefit
                                   registered especially within the first 12 weeks of treatment, the
                                   period in which maintenance of the dose of RBV has been shown
                                   to be the most critical. The major conversion site of taribavirin is
                                   in the liver, enabling drug concentration in this location. Due to
                                   its lower uptake in red blood cells, taribavirin causes
                                   significantly less hemolytic anemia compared to RBV. While this
                                   effect was confirmed in several clinical studies, the rates of SVR
                                   were lower with taribavirin.
                                    In two phase III studies, taribavirin failed to prove
                                   noninferiority compared to RBV (SVR rates were 38% and 40%
                                   with taribavirin vs. 52% and 55% with RBV in the VISER 1 and
                                   VISER 2 trials, respectively), even if taribavirin caused lower
                                   rates of severe anemia (5% vs 24%). Suboptimal dosing of
                                   taribavirin (Marcellin 2010) seems to be the explanation, as
                                   recent studies with weight-based dosing of taribavirin confirmed
                                   reduced rates of anemia (7%-15% vs. 24% with RBV), while
                                   acquiring comparable SVR rates and lower relapse rates than
                                   RBV. Whether taribavirin will have a role in the future
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69