Page 16 - The Flying Publisher Guide to Hepatitis C Treatment
P. 16

16   | Hepatitis C Treatment

                                   2010) suggests that PegIFN alfa-2a may be associated with an
                                   increased benefit in terms of SVR compared to PegIFN alfa-2b,
                                   although the largest head-to-head trial (IDEAL study) failed to
                                   find a significant difference in SVR rates between the two PegIFN
                                   formulations (McHutchison 2009). Nevertheless, the two
                                   products seem to be comparable in terms of adverse effects (AEs)
                                   leading to treatment discontinuation.
                                    As long as SVR is only a surrogate marker of clinical outcomes
                                   (liver failure, HCC and mortality) and the data on the long-term
                                   AEs are limited, both regimens seems to be equally effective in
                                   the clinical practice.
                                    It is important to mention that HCV has notable properties by
                                   which it can inhibit the actions of IFNs. The HCV protease
                                   NS3/4A blocks important proteins and enzymes within the cells
                                   (such as IRF3, a key transcriptional regulator of the IFN
                                   response, and retinoid-inducible gene 1- RIG1, a growth
                                   regulator), leading to a reduction in the expression of IFN-
                                   signaling genes (Bode 2008).
                                    Ribavirin (RBV) has both antiviral and immunomodulatory
                                   actions. Although RBV monotherapy has little influence against
                                   HCV, in combination with interferon it improves dramatically
                                   the response rates. Being a guanosine analog, RBV acts by direct
                                   inhibition of nucleic acid elongation and of enzymes important
                                   in viral replication, such as inosine monophosphate
                                   dehydrogenase (IMPDH), as well as by induction of lethal
                                   mutagenesis during the viral life-cycle. Although the specific
                                   mechanism has not yet been completely elucidated, there is
                                   increasing evidence of RBV acting as a true antiviral agent and
                                   thus having a critical role in the suppression of viral replication.
                                   RBV amplifies the effect of IFN, generating a significant decrease
                                   in the relapse rate (Manns 2001, Fried 2002).
                                    Adding RBV to PegIFNs was recommended by consensus in
                                   Europe in 1999 and in the United States in 2002. Subsequently, it
                                   has been shown that weight–dosed RBV is more effective in
                                   acquiring a high rate of therapeutic success. In today’s regimens,
                                   RBV is administered according to patient’s weight: 1000 mg/day
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21