Page 25 - 69 stomac-duodenum-&-small-intestine66-72_opt
P. 25

Necrotising Enterocolitis   421
                            Ethical Issues                                   Evidence-Based Research
          Many of the ethical issues involved in the treatment of NEC in devel-  Table 70.3 presents a study that compares primary peritoneal drainage
          oping nations relate to the challenge of proper and efficient allocation   and  laparotomy  in  infants  with  perforated  NEC.  Table  70.4  revisits
          of  scarce  resources.  The  survival  rate  of  the  disease  often  relies  on   indications for surgery in NEC.
          prolonged, intensive, and costly ICU care, so the question arises as to   Table 70.4: Evidence-based research
          the advisability of expending precious time and money on aggressive
          interventions  only  to  yield  poor  survival  rates.  Additionally,  a  high   Title  Indications for operation in necrotizing enterocolitis revisited
          percentage of the survivors of NEC in these regions end up with long-  Authors  Kosloske AM
          term complications that cannot be adequately managed, which leads to   Institution  Department of Surgery, Ohio State University College of
          further morbidity and mortality. These issues must be evaluated based   Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA: University of New Mexico
          on the resources of each individual region.                         Hospital, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
                                                                   Reference  J Pediat Surg 1994; 29(5):663–666
          Table 70.3: Evidence-based research.
                                                                   Problem    Evaluation of 12 criteria as predictors of intestinal gangrene
            Title      Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing   in patients with necrotising enterocolitis.
                       enterocolitis and drainage
                                                                   Comparison/  A series of 147 infants treated for NEC was analysed
            Authors    Moss RL, Dimmitt RA, Barnhart DC, Sylvester KG, Brown   control   to evaluate the accuracy of 12 proposed findings as
                       RL, Powell DM, et al.                       (quality of   indicators of intestinal gangrene. These findings included
            Institution  Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven,   evidence)  pneumoperitoneum, portal venous gas, fixed loop,
                                                                              fixed abdominal mass, erythema of abdomen, positive
                       Connecticut, USA; among others
                                                                              paracentesis, severe pneumatosis, clinical deterioration,
            Reference  N Engl J Med 2006; 354(21):2225–2234                   low platelet count, severe gastrointestinal haemorrhage,
                                                                              abdominal tenderness, and gasless abdomen/ascites.
            Problem    Evaluation of primary peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy   Operation was performed (usually resection and
                       in infants with perforated necrotising enterocolitis.  enterostomy) for evidence of intestinal perforation or
            Intervention  Laparotomy, primary peritoneal drainage.            gangrene. Intestinal gangrene was documented for all infants
                                                                              by either operation, autopsy, or radiographic findings of
            Comparison/  The population was 117 preterm infants (delivered before   pneumoperitoneum or intestinal stricture.
            control    34 weeks of gestation) with birth weights less than 1,500 g   Outcome/  The findings of pneumoperitoneum, portal venous gas, and
            (quality of   and perforated NEC at 15 paediatric centres randomised   effect  positive paracentesis each had specificities and positive
                       to undergo primary peritoneal drainage or laparotomy with
            evidence)                                                         predictive values approaching 100% with a prevalence
                       bowel resection. Postoperative care was standardised. The
                       primary outcome was survival at 90 days postoperatively.   greater than 10%. Pneumoperitoneum had a prevalence of
                       Secondary outcomes included dependence on parenteral   48%. The findings of a “fixed-loop,” palpable abdominal mass
                       nutrition 90 days postoperatively and length of hospital   and erythema of the abdominal wall also had specificities
                       stay.                                                  and positive predictive values approaching 100% but had
                                                                              a prevalence below 10%. Severe pneumatosis had a
            Outcome/   At 90 days postoperatively, there was no significant   specificity of 91%, and positive predictive value of 94% and
            effect     difference in mortality between the drainage and       a prevalence of 20%. The remaining five findings all had
                       laparotomy groups (34.5% versus 35.5%, P = 0.92).      specificities below 90%, positive predictive values below
                       There was also no significant difference in dependence on   80%, and prevalence ranging between 2% and 28%.
                       parental nutrition (47.2 % versus 40.0%, P = 0.53) or mean
                       length of stay (126±58 days and 116±56 days, respectively;   Historical   Although no single finding is particularly sensitive for
                       P = 0.43).                                  significance/   intestinal necrosis, the findings of pneumoperitoneum, portal
                                                                   comments   venous gas, positive paracentesis, fixed-loop sign, palpable
            Historical   This randomised, prospective trial suggests that treatment   abdominal mass, and erythema of the abdominal wall all
            significance/   with primary peritoneal drainage and laparotomy with bowel   had specificities approaching 100% and may be used as an
            comments   resection are comparably efficacious in the treatment of   indication for surgical intervention. Severe pneumatosis was
                       perforated NEC. Mortality in this patient population was   also found to have a fair specificity for intestinal necrosis. The
                       found to be ~35%. Although 5 out of the 30 patients (16.7%)   remaining findings had poor specificity and positive predictive
                       in the primary peritoneal drainage group subsequently   value. Although seven of these findings were highly specific
                       required laparotomy for clinical deterioration, drainage   for intestinal necrosis, the prevalence of these signs were
                       obviated the need for laparotomy in the remaining infants   low. As such, the absence of these findings cannot rule out
                       without any discernible increase in mortality.         intestinal necrosis, and the decision for surgical intervention
                                                                              will often rely on clinical judgment of the managing surgeon.

                                                    Key Summary Points

             1.  Necrotising enterocolitis occurs in 1–3 infants per 1,000 live births.  9.  Pneumoperitoneum is an absolute indication for surgical
                                                                   intervention; relative indications include a fixed-loop on
              2.  Ninety percent of cases occur in premature infants.  abdominal radiographs, an abdominal mass or erythema of the
              3.  Mortality rates range between 15% and 30%.       abdominal wall on physical exam, positive paracentesis, and
              4.  The aetiology and pathophysiology of the disease is not well   whether there is little or no evidence of clinical improvement.
                understood.                                      10. Primary peritoneal drainage and laparotomy are comparable
              5.  Prematurity as well as timing and content of gastrointestinal   treatments for perforated necrotising enterocolitis.
                feeding are the most consistent risk factors associated with NEC.   11. Surgical goals focus on resection of frankly necrotic bowel with
              6.  Human breast milk has been shown to be protective against   an effort to preserve intestinal length.
                the development of NEC.                          12. Advances in intensive care unit facilities in developed nations
              7.  NEC presents with both specific gastrointestinal signs   have translated into improved survival in patients with NEC.
                of vomiting, distention, and blood per rectum as well as   13. More aggressive surgical protocols may improve survival in
                nonspecific signs of haemodynamic instability.     developing nations that lack modern intensive care unit facilities.
              8.  Abdominal radiography is the primary imaging tool in
                establishing the diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis.
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30