Page 19 - Drug Class Review
P. 19

Final Report Update 1                                             Drug Effectiveness Review Project



               conducted in patients with moderate to severe AD.   Most trials specifically excluded patients with
               vascular dementia and clinically significant neurologic disease other than AD.  Some trials did not specify

               such exclusion criteria or report the proportion of patients with such comorbid disease.  Most studies
               allowed patients to use other medications except for drugs with cholinomimetic effects or anticholinergic
               medications.




               C. Outcome measures

               Studies commonly included measures to assess symptom stabilization (e.g., cognition, global assessment
               of change) and behavioral disturbances.  Most studies included a measure of cognition (e.g., ADAS-cog)
               as the primary outcome;  other commonly included  measures of cognition were the  MMSE and SIB.

               Global change often was measured using scales such as the CGI-C, CIBIC-plus, or GDS; functional status
               was commonly assessed using measures such as the ADCS-ADL, DAD, Bristol ADL, and PDS.  Changes

               in mood, behavior, and personality were assessed with measures such as the NPI or BEHAVE-AD.  Some
               studies included other instruments that assessed quality of life or caregiver burden.



               D. Head-to-head comparisons

               We did not identify any randomized, double-blind, comparative trials.  We did identify three open-label

                                                                                              27
               head-to-head trials. 27-29    One trial  compared donepezil to galantamine over 52 weeks,  one compared
                                                                                                            29
                                                    28
               donepezil to galantamine over 12 weeks,  and one compared donepezil to rivastigmine over 12 weeks.
               These trials blinded only the rater to treatment allocation.  Although open-label trials are subject to “fatal
               flaws” for internal validity, we review their results because they provide the only comparative evidence.
               We do not provide quality ratings for these trials.


               We included two meta-analysis 30, 31  that evaluated evidence comparing donepezil, galantamine, and
               rivastigmine with placebo.  Although these reviews do not make indirect comparisons among included

               ChEIs, the quantitative summary of placebo-controlled trials is  useful for summarizing evidence for
               ChEIs in general.


               Donepezil vs. Galantamine

               One 52-week open-label trial compared donepezil 10 mg/day to galantamine 24 mg/day in 182 patients
                                                                              27
               with probable AD and MMSE scores between 9 and 18 at screening.   Although raters were blinded to
               treatment allocation, patients, caregivers, and physicians were not blinded because of differences between




                 Alzheimer's Drugs                                                               Page 19 of 205
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24