Page 45 - Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques for the Detection of Skin Cancers
P. 45
39. Patel JK, Konda S, Perez OA, et al. Newer 49. Halpern AC. Total body skin imaging as an
technologies/techniques and tools in the aid to melanoma detection. [Review] [29
diagnosis of melanoma. [Review] [172 refs]. refs]. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine &
European Journal of Dermatology Surgery 2003;22(1):2-8.
2008;18(6):617-631.
50. Campos-do-Carmo G, Ramos-e-Silva.
40. Drugge RJ, Nguyen C, Gliga L, et al. Dermoscopy: basic concepts. [Review] [22
Clinical pathway for melanoma detection refs]. International Journal of Dermatology
using comprehensive cutaneous analysis 2008;47(7):712-719.
with Melanoscan. Dermatology Online
Journal 2010;16(8):1. 51. venuto-Andrade C, Dusza SW, Agero AL, et
al. Differences between polarized light
41. Zhou Y, Smith M, Smith L, et al. Using 3D dermoscopy and immersion contact
differential forms to characterize a dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin
pigmented lesion in vivo. Skin Research & lesions. Arch Dermatol 2007;143(3):329-
Technology 2010;16(1):77-84. 338.
42. Christensen JH, Soerensen MB, Linghui Z, 52. Bassoli S, Seidenari S. Benefits of polarized
et al. Pre-diagnostic digital imaging versus nonpolarized dermoscopy. Expert
prediction model to discriminate between Review of Dermatology 2010.
malignant melanoma and benign pigmented
skin lesion. Skin Research & Technology 53. Marchionda PJ, Krause LK, Jensen JD, et al.
A North American perspective on
2010;16(1):98-108.
dermoscopy: benefits, limitations, and grey
43. Green WH, Wang SQ, Cognetta Jr AB. zones. [Review] [108 refs]. Giornale Italiano
Total-body cutaneous examination, total- di Dermatologia e Venereologia
body photography, and dermoscopy in the 2010;145(1):89-97.
care of a patient with xeroderma
pigmentosum and multiple melanomas. 54. Wang SQ, Dusza SW, Scope A, et al.
Differences in dermoscopic images from
Archives of Dermatology 2009;145(8):910-
915. nonpolarized dermoscope and polarized
dermoscope influence the diagnostic
44. Malvehy J, Puig S. Follow-up of accuracy and confidence level: a pilot study.
melanocytic skin lesions with digital total- Dermatologic Surgery 2008;34(10):1389-
body photography and digital dermoscopy: a 1395.
two-step method. [Review] [41 refs]. Clinics 55. Argenziano G, Puig S, Zalaudek I, et al.
in Dermatology 2002;20(3):297-304.
Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary
45. Rademaker M, Oakley A. Digital care physicians to triage lesions suggestive
monitoring by whole body photography and of skin cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology
sequential digital dermoscopy detects 2006;24(12):1877-1882.
thinner melanomas. Journal of Primary
Health Care 2010;2(4):268-272. 56. Carli P, De G V, Chiarugi A, et al. Addition
of dermoscopy to conventional naked-eye
46. Massone C, Wurm EM, Soyer HP. examination in melanoma screening: a
Teledermatology. [Review] [50 refs]. randomized study. Journal of the American
Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Academy of Dermatology 2004;50(5):683-
Venereologia 2008;143(3):213-218. 689.
47. Harrison PV, Kirby B, Dickinson Y, et al. 57. Noor O, Nanda A, Rao BK. A dermoscopy
Teledermatology—high technology or not? survey to assess who is using it and why it is
Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare or is not being used. Int J Dermatol
1998;4:Suppl-2. 2009;48(9):951-952.
48. BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina. 58. Massone C, Di SA, Soyer HP. Dermoscopy
Evidence Based Guideline Total Body for skin cancer detection. [Review] [71 refs].
Photography. Available at: Current Opinion in Oncology
http://www.bcbsnc.com/assets/services/publi 2005;17(2):147-153.
c/pdfs/medicalpolicy/total_body_photograph
y.pdf . 2009. Accessed August 23, 2011.
36
