Page 49 - Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary
P. 49

Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary


                                HeALtH LiteRACY, eHeALtH, AnD CoMMUniCAtion

            TAbLE 3-2  Comparison of Principles of Web 2.0 and Web 1.0
            Principle          Web 2.0                    Traditional (Web 1.0)
            Power              Decentralized (autonomy;   Centralized (experts);
                               information self sufficiency)  dependence
            Priorities         Guided by community        Guided by technology
                               perspectives/norms, bottom up   developers
            Filtering          Downstream (e.g., user ranking)  Upstream
            Nature of information   Coproducers           Passive receivers—
            consumption                                   consumption
            Learning           Collective—capacity building  Exclusive
            Content Credibility  Based on understandable   Based on science
                               language, experiential knowledge
            Culture            Enabling                   Compliance
            SOURCE: Kukafka, 2008.



            nologies with the more traditional Web 1.0.  In moving from the Web 1.0
                                                  5
            technology to Web 2.0 one moves from a centralized control situation to
            one of decentralized priorities. This is consistent with participatory action
            research methods, the methods used in the HHPC approach.
               There are a number of mechanisms available in Web 2.0 by which the
            community filters material, such as community ratings. With Web 2.0 the
            receivers of information are coproducers of information as well, rather
            than just passive recipients, so that eventually, if enough people use the
            system,  information  is  self-corrected.  Content  in  Web  2.0  technologies
            is based on the experiential model or knowledge, and the culture of the
            technology moves from one of compliance to an enabling culture.
               Web 2.0 structures facilitate social networking participation, collabo-
            ration, and openness within and between user groups. Information in this
            newer type of platform is liberated from the control of experts, which in
            the Harlem community was a source of mistrust. Community members
            will be able to create, assemble, organize, locate, and share content to meet
            their own needs and the needs of their community.
               In a Web 2.0 technology, information is perceived as direct or unme-
            diated.  Such  information  is  more  credible  than  mediated  information
            because the presence of mediation through a gatekeeper makes it pos-



             5   Web 1.0 is “a general reference to the World Wide Web during its first few years of opera-
            tion. The term is mostly used to contrast the earlier days of the Web before blogs, wikis, so-
            cial networking sites and Web-based applications became commonplace” (http://dictionary.
            zdnet.com/definition/Web+1.0.html). Accessed November 3, 2008.





                 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54