Page 106 - 20dynamics of cancer
P. 106

PROGRESSION DYNAMICS                                         91


                                          -RGMHIRGI                 WPSTI EFSYX

                                                  'SPSVIGXEP GERGIV








                                                               %KI


                              Figure 5.1  Age-specific incidence for colorectal cancer. Data for all males from
                              the SEER database (www.seer.cancer.gov) using the nine SEER registries, year of
                              diagnosis 1992–2000.
                              way with age when plotted on log-log scales. In an earlier chapter, Fig-
                              ure 2.2 showed that log-log plots of incidence are approximately linear
                              for many cancers.
                                The line in Figure 5.1 fits a model in which

                                                         I = ct n−1 ,

                              where I is cancer incidence at age t, the exponent n − 1 determines the
                              rate of increase in cancer incidence with age, and c is a constant. Taking
                              the logarithm of both sides of this equation gives the log-log scaling
                              shown in the figure

                                               log (I) = log (c) + (n − 1) log (t) ,

                              in particular, the figure plots log(I) versus log(t). The line in Figure 5.1
                              has a slope of n − 1 ≈ 5.
                                The linear rise on log-log scales means that incidence is increasing
                              exponentially with age in proportion to t n−1 . In the early 1950s, several
                              authors wondered what might explain this exponential rise in incidence
                              with age (Frank 2004c; Moolgavkar 2004).
                                Fisher and Hollomon (1951) recognized that cancer incidence would
                              increase as t n−1  if transformation required n independent steps. The
                              argument is roughly as follows. Suppose each step happens at a rate of
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111