Page 50 - Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients
P. 50

Ferreira 2007  (Continued)



                 Reference standard results blinded?  Yes                      The measurement bias was controlled
                 All tests                                                     through the “blind” interpretation of the
                                                                               test regarding the coronary angiography,
                                                                               which was considered the reference stan-
                                                                               dard

                 Index test results blinded?    Yes                            The recorded images were later interpreted
                 All tests                                                     by two members who were blinded to the
                                                                               patients’ clinical data, as independent ob-
                                                                               servers. The discordance was solved by con-
                                                                               sensus between the two observers

                 Relevant clinical information?  Yes                           Relevant clinical information was provided
                 All tests                                                     regarding the performance and analysis of
                                                                               both the index and reference tests
                 Uninterpretable results reported?  Yes                        Of 148 patients submitted to the test, 135
                 All tests                                                     finished the protocol, which corresponds to
                                                                               a feasibility of 91%. The reasons that led
                                                                               to test interruption were: attaining 85% of
                                                                               maximum CF for age: 121 (81%); limiting
                                                                               side effects: 13 (9%); echocardiographic
                                                                               signs of ischaemia: 10 (7%) and end of the
                                                                               protocol: 4 (3%)

                 Withdrawals explained?         Yes                            Thirteen patients presented an early with-
                 All tests                                                     drawal of the protocol due to limiting side
                                                                               effects: 12 (8.5%) due to hypertensive re-
                                                                               sponse and 1 (0.5%) due to severe angina


                Gang 2007

                 Clinical features and settings  Clinical features
                                                  • Patients with DM and ESKD who presented for kidney transplant cardiac
                                                evaluation
                                                Setting
                                                  • Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Gujarat, India


                 Participants                     • Number: 40
                                                  • Type 2 DM: 100%
                                                  • ESKD: 100%
                                                  • Angina pectoris: 5%
                                                  • Hypertension: 92%
                                                  • Sex: 90% male

                 Study design                   Cross sectional study.




                Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients (Review)  48
                Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55