Page 25 - Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients
P. 25

Summary of results  (Continued)



                 Post test probability after positive screening 73% to 90%  55% to 81%
                 test result for a patient with intermediate
                 risk (30% to 59% pre test probability) dis-
                 ease

                 Post test probability after positive screening 91% to 98%  81% to 96%
                 test result for a patient with high risk (60%
                 to 90% pre test probability) disease

                 Post test probability after negative screen- 3% to 10%  5% to 15%
                 ing test result for a patient with low risk
                 (10% to 29% pre test probability) disease
                 Post test probability after negative screen- 10% to 27%  16% to 38%
                 ing test result for a patient with intermedi-
                 ate risk (30% to 59% pre test probability)
                 disease

                 Post test probability after negative screen- 28% to 70%  39% to 79%
                 ing test result for a patient with high risk
                 (60% to 90% pre test probability) disease


                 Conclusions and comments
                 Both tests, especially DSE, have a role as triage tests for intermediate risk transplant candidates, with negative results precluding
                 the need for further evaluation with coronary angiography, thereby avoiding unnecessary risk to patients and potentially reducing
                 healthcare costs
                 Given the wide heterogeneity in the estimates for both DSE and MPS, there is still considerable uncertainty in the true post-test
                 probabilities of each test
                 Current evidence suggests that, where feasible, DSE should be used as the screening investigation of choice over MPS

                 Applicability of tests in clinical practice


                 Both DSE and MPS have a role as triage tests for the intermediate risk transplant candidates, with negative results reducing the need
                 for further evaluation with coronary angiography. In high risk patients, a positive non-invasive DSE or MPS confirms the high risk
                 of severe CAD, but a negative result does not conclusively rule out severe CAD. In these patients, one may consider proceeding
                 immediately to coronary angiography and avoid using functional tests
                 The relatively low sensitivity and specificity of both DSE and MPS however means that they are not perfect triage tests and a significant
                 number of patients will either have their significant CAD missed (false negatives) or be referred in vain for coronary angiography
                 (false positive)
                 Despite the shortcomings of the non-invasive tests in their role as triage tests, the very select nature of the population and the unique
                 challenges facing cardiac investigation in this population (particularly, the need to avoid complications arising from an invasive gold
                 standard) and the lack of an alternate better performing test means that we are forced to accept an imperfect triage test
                 Functional testing may provide additional prognostic information, although an investigation into this was not included under the
                 scope of this review.

                 Costs




                Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients (Review)  23
                Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30