Page 109 - 15Diarrhoeaandvomiting
P. 109

Diarrhoea and vomiting caused by gastroenteritis in children under 5 years




                        The two groups had similar characteristics at the start of the study. Five patients were considered
                        treatment failures (two in the rice bean group and three in the rice soy group). The mean energy
                        consumption was similar between the two groups up to day 4, but consumption was greater in
                        the rice bean diet group compared with the rice soy diet group on day 5 (161.8 ± 17.5 kcal/kg
                        per day versus 138.8 ± 21.0 kcal/kg per day; P < 0.001) and day 6 (161.8 ± 13.7 kcal/kg per day
                        versus 144.6 ± 20.1 kcal/kg per day; P < 0.001). There were no differences between the two diet
                        groups regarding the overall weight gain or length of hospital stay but the duration of diarrhoea
                        was significantly less in the rice bean group compared with the rice soy group (60 hours versus
                        121 hours; P = 0.01). [EL = 1−]

                        Two of the RCTs compared the use of porridge in different consistencies.
                        In one Bangladeshi study, 129  infants aged 6–23 months with a history of watery diarrhoea of less
                        than 72 hours’ duration and three or more liquid stools in the 24 hours before admission were
                        recruited. Those with systemic infections (pneumonia, bacteria or other complications) or severe
                        malnutrition were excluded. The children were randomly assigned (using separate randomisation
                        lists for under and over age 1 year and coded envelopes) to either amylase-treated wheat porridge
                        (n = 32), unaltered thick porridge (n = 32) or porridge diluted with water (n = 31). Participants were
                        stabilised with oral or IV rehydration therapy as necessary and a hospital milk–cereal mixture diet
                        for 24 hours. The three groups had similar characteristics at the start of the study although overall
                        more boys were younger than 1 year. Blinded assessors measured outcomes daily for 5 days. The
                        mean intake of porridge and the total energy intake was greatest in the amylase-treated porridge
                        group (ANOVA P < 0.001) but there were no statistically significant differences in weight change
                        or duration of diarrhoea among the three groups. Significantly fewer children in the unaltered
                        thick porridge group vomited at day 2 than in the amylase-treated porridge group (40.6% versus
                        76%; P < 0.01) or dilute porridge group (40.6% versus 64.5%; P < 0.01), but there were no
                        further differences among groups up to day 5. [EL = 1+]
                        The second study 130  was conducted in Tanzania and recruited children aged 6–25 months who
                        had  been  hospitalised  for  acute  watery  diarrhoea  (defined  as  stools  more  watery  and  more
                        frequent than usual, and for less than 14 days based on parent’s history, and severe enough to
                        require hospital admission). Unweaned children or those with a congenital or chronic condition
                        interfering with food intake or kwashiorkor were excluded, as were children discharged after
                        only 1 day and children requiring nasogastric feeding tubes. Rehydration therapy (according to
                        WHO guidelines) was given as necessary before children were randomly assigned (using block
                        randomisation lists and sealed envelopes) to feeding with either normal corn porridge (n = 26),
                        amylase-digested porridge (n = 25) or fermented and amylase-digested porridge (n = 24). The three
                        groups had similar characteristics at the start of the study. There were no statistically significant
                        differences in duration of diarrhoea, recurrence of diarrhoea, median weight change or the need
                        for IV rehydration therapy between the three groups at any point. There were a total of four
                        deaths during the trial – one from pneumonia in the fermented and amylase-digested porridge
                        group and three in the amylase-digested porridge group, where two children died of pneumonia
                        and one from suspected septicaemia. However, the mean daily energy intake on days 1–4 was
                        greater in the amylase-digested porridge group compared with the normal porridge group (46.0
                        ± 1.4 kcal/kg per day versus 32.4 ± 1.4 kcal/kg per day; P = 0.003). The study did not state the
                        mother/child preference. [EL = 1+]
                        Three of the RCTs compared solid food with soy formula.
                        Infants aged 5–24 months with diarrhoea (more than three stools per day) for less than 96 hours
                        were recruited in a trial conducted in Peru. 131  Exclusion criteria were the use of antibiotics (more
                        than one dose), breastfeeding (one feed per day), malnutrition (>2 SD below the international
                        reference data) or a diarrhoeal episode in the previous 2 weeks. Children were randomly assigned
                        (fixed interval, block randomisation to allow for age and dehydration confounders) to either a
                        soy-based lactose-free formula (n = 29), wheat peas diet (wheat flour, pea flour, carrot flour,
                        soybean oil, cotton seed oil, sugar) (n = 28) or potato milk diet (potato flour, dry whole milk,
                        carrot flour, soybean oil, cotton seed oil, sugar) (n = 28). The allocation of interventions was not
                        masked. The three groups had similar characteristics at the start of the study although the soy
                        formula group were slightly older than the other groups. There were five treatment failures – one
                        in the soy formula group and two each in the wheat peas diet and potato milk diet groups. There
                        were no statistically significant differences in energy intake or weight gain between the three


            84
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114