Page 74 - Screening for Cervical Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review
P. 74

Chapter IV.  Discussion



               Definitive evidence on which to base recommendations and further model performance of HPV

               will be available from US and European trials within the year.




               Benefits and Harms


                       The tangible benefit of cervical cancer screening is reduction of cervical cancer morbidity


               and mortality by identification of treatable precursors or early stage disease.  Intangible benefits

               (such as reassurance for those with normal Pap tests) or concurrent preventive care at the time of


               Pap testing (such as screening for sexually transmitted disease or contraceptive counseling) are

               not documented.  These intangible benefits are of particular interest because presumably they


               play a role in the persistence of annual screening among low-risk patients.  Although some

               observers postulate that such overscreening occurs as a result of provider habit and the tradition


               of the annual pelvic examination, published evidence does not address either patient or provider

               knowledge, attitudes, or desire for annual testing.


                       Harms of screening are poorly understood.  The majority of relevant research documents

               the psychological distress associated with the having an abnormal Pap test.  Qualitative studies

               suggest: (1) women have unmet information needs about the meaning of abnormal results and


               lack factual information about what to expect during subsequent evaluation; (2) they experience

               distress and anxiety before and after evaluation while the diagnosis is unknown; and (3) patient


               education interventions can successfully reduce the fear and uncertainty associated with follow-

               up care for abnormal Pap testing. 74-80   Long-term concerns of women with and without definitive


               diagnosis of cervical abnormality and the influence of previous evaluation and outcomes on

               future screening behavior are unclear.










                                                             80
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79